In Buddhism it is often assumed no meat is ever eaten by a 'real' Buddhist. This is very far from the actual truth. In the Majjhima Nikayas (The middle discourses of the Buddha) MN (Chapter) 55 is the Jivaka Sutra. (Jivaka was the physician of the Buddha and helped him when his foot got cut by a stone rolled down a hill by his step-brother Devdutt as he intended to kill him, and at the end of the Buddha's life when he lie with pain (Some say from eating meat {pork}). (Here is a link to the sutra if you like... http://www.suttas.com/mn-55-jivaka-sutta-to-jivaka.html) Here is a real paraphrased paragraph...
On the Buddhist journey, it is best to take the centered path. Meditation, mindfulness and practice of the Dharma. Study and learn together and expand our consciousness, compassion and wisdom.
Friday, September 17, 2021
Hamburgers and the monks
Wednesday, July 14, 2021
Harmful meditation? Here are my comments on recent papers and studies.
My commentary on an article about the 'harms' of meditation. All of my comments are in THIS BLUE.
Can Meditation Cause You Harm?
A new study investigates whether mindfulness may have bad side effects for some people.
BY MARIANNE SPOON | SEPTEMBER 25, 2020Potential side effects are often front and center when considering taking medicine for physical or mental conditions, but information is less clear with treatments like meditation that don’t come in pill form.
There is a very good reason for this. For one, meditation is difficult to study and have 'animal studies' or even control groups. The psyche is very unique and difficult to test even in the best of studies. Pills have a set of chemicals that we can isolate and know exactly their attributes and effects on human physiology. Thoughts or 'lack of thought' as some people understand meditation does not have the same effects on human physiology.
Popular media and case studies have recently highlighted negative side effects from meditation—increases in depression, anxiety, and even psychosis or mania—but few studies have looked at the issue in depth across large numbers of people.
Yes, however, over 2,600 years of empirical and well documented work has gone into many practices of meditation we know today. There are plenty of anecdotal and personal accounts of people that have indeed suffered and even committed suicide from meditating. The cinch pin is the method, understanding of the process of meditation and teaching.
SIDE EFFECTS TO MEDITATION?
At Brown University, the Varieties of Contemplative Experience research project studies meditation experiences that are "unexpected, challenging, difficult, distressing, or impairing of functioning." They describe these challenges in a 2017 study.
Read "The Dark Knight of the Soul" in The Atlantic.
In a recent paper featured in the journal Psychological Medicine, researchers at the Center for Healthy Minds at the University of Wisconsin–Madison found that people who took part in the most common and widely available secular mindfulness program did not experience psychological harm at a rate higher than people in control groups who did not take part in the program.
When we write a paper it is most proper to have a reference, for this paper 'Prevalence of harm in mindfulness-based stress reduction' it specifically states; "We find no evidence that MBSR leads to higher rates of harm relative to waitlist control on any primary or secondary outcome. On many indices of harm across multiple outcomes, community MBSR was significantly preventative of harm." SO basically the whole premise of the article is not much more than clickbait and nonsense. It is basically trying to cause distress in people that are considering meditation (but will not read the actual article) and to give fodder to those that try and debunk meditation as a viable and useful tool in psychotherapy, sociotherapy and even pain control.
As meditation joins a growing list of treatment options for stress, depression, and substance abuse, so does the need to understand when it’s effective and when it may pose risks.
“With any treatment of any kind—behavioral or drug—there are two sides,” says Matt Hirshberg, a 2019 National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation postdoctoral research fellow at the Center who led the study. “What are the benefits and what are the risks of harm? The research on mindfulness meditation has overwhelmingly focused on the benefits—how it works, to what extent it works, and so on. This paper intended to provide empirical estimates of potential risks.”
I agree that we need to honestly look at possible harm in the practice of meditation but not to overstate it or blow it out of proportion. One of the problems I have seen in speaking to many that have practiced meditation in one form or another and teached for decades is that when someone does not have a good mental health status to begin with it can lead to more trouble. Especially when many MBSR instructors have very little training and the premise of MBSR is most basically rumination without any moral teachings. In Buddhism's version of meditation which gave birth to the MBSR movement one of the main aspects of Buddhist teachings was abandoned. That is the Four Noble Truths, Noble Eight Fold Path, and Dependent Origination/The Wheel of Becoming or Samsara... and the entire concept those portray as 'Sila'. One of the most unfortunate things about this study paper as well as MBSR itself is that a main aspect of meditation practice is also ignored. It is not really designed to deal with outright mental illness. Meditation practice is a very true and useful tool in mental health. There is a difference.
In the analysis, researchers examined data from more than 2,150 adults who took part in a community health clinic Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) class between 2002 and 2016. MBSR is a standard eight-week mindfulness program typically taught in person that is offered widely in health care settings.
A good study size but only in one metro area and hardly representative of the population or even the meditation practitioner population. I was unable to find what people in the paper were under treatment for and how they ended up in the MBSR program.
The team looked at before-and-after results on a common assessment of psychological symptoms and a measure of troublesome physical symptoms. They also included data from three National Institutes of Health-sponsored studies on MBSR that had people who were randomly assigned to control groups and compared harm in those studies with community MBSR. This allowed the group to examine results and levels of harm in people who did not take MBSR.
There are a slew of surveys for mental health and psychological symptom surveys but there is no mention of which one was used or if it was merely set up by the writers of the original paper.
Because there is no standard way to assess harm, researchers looked at several common measures of harm, including whether average symptoms worsened, the number of people who reported increased symptoms, the number reporting greater than a 35% increase in symptoms, and clinically significant harm, or the proportion of people who reported a categorical worsening in symptoms (e.g., from normal symptom level to mildly symptomatic).
The scientific team did not find a single instance in which harm that was experienced by people in MBSR (community or research) was greater than the increased negative symptoms experienced by people in the control group who received no treatment.
Again, here is the important take away of this article. There was not a single instance of 'harm'. So does that mean that it is absolutely safe? Not by a long shot really. Someone in severe mental disruption should probably not be told to do meditative practices even with a seasoned teacher or coordinator. They should be evaluated properly and treated for any physical or chemical issues that are found first. Then and only then could a meditation practice be considered.
For instance, if someone presents with serious and detailed suicidal ideations and they begin meditation, it is likely that they may ruminate on why and how they will proceed rather than find anything useful to really work on.
In addition, on about half of the harm measures the researchers examined, rates of harm in MBSR were significantly lower than those in the no-treatment group. Hirshberg notes that these findings “suggest that MBSR may not only be no more harmful than no treatment, it may actually be preventative of developing increased psychological and physical symptoms.”
Again, basically this seems to be a pitch for MBSR even when compared to people that did nothing. This smells of fluff rather than academically serious research.
The researchers were careful to note, however, that more research of potential preventative effects is needed because most preventative effects were observed in comparisons between community MBSR and people in the research MBSR studies who received no treatment—groups that had significantly different levels of symptoms at baseline.
If you read enough research papers, this is the rule. Always note that more research needs to be done. This is a staple of all research as there is no research that definitively proves anything. There is always outliers, mistakes, small sample sizes and amendments to be made. Not that this was not a good effort, but it is not the end for sure.
I for one, look forward to more research on the subject as well as collaboration between MBSR and other forms of meditation. This may help us gain insights into how the mind really does work and how it can be actively and passively helped into a more healthy and skillful state of being.
Still, Hirshberg warns, this doesn’t mean that no one participating in MBSR experiences harm. It remains important to expand the research to understand the experiences of the small number of individuals who have adverse reactions. Hirshberg also noted that due to limitations in the data, they were not able to examine whether socioeconomic status or race and ethnicity were related to harm.“The fact that incidents of harm appear to be low in MBSR is important because most mindfulness-based interventions are derivatives of MBSR, and it’s the root of practices we see offered in schools, health care, and workplaces,” says Hirshberg. “It’s really important to know the prevalence of people who are having adverse reactions.”
Another question to explore further is the subjective interpretation of harm. In some meditation traditions, temporary discomfort, negative thoughts, and unusual somatic experiences might be indicative of progress in one’s practice.
Spectacular point, in fact there was a few different articles on this and I have a good study that did expand on what we know. Here is that link. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5584749/
“The distinction is not always made clear enough when we hear about cases of harm,” says Hirshberg. “Meditation practice means many different things, from intensive meditation retreats for months or even years to 10 minutes of daily practice at home. Most reported cases of harm are related to more intensive practice. They are really different categories. We can’t infer about harm in intensive practice from these findings and, similarly, we cannot infer about potential harm in MBSR or similar programs from harm following intensive practice.”
I am curious as to what 'more intensive' really means. The article here gives a great list of practices and does recognize there are many different opinions and ways TO meditate. On the one hand I would consider an MBSR treatment class of six weeks to be pretty intensive for someone that can barely sit still for a few minutes.
This article was originally published on the Center for Healthy Minds
Reminder: The 'BLUE' font is my addition and commentary on this article. If you go to the original article study there are some good references to look at . Here are a couple more.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5584749/
https://www.insider.com/why-meditation-can-be-bad-2018-3#6-it-might-damage-your-sense-of-self-6
https://www.vice.com/en/article/vbaedd/meditation-is-a-powerful-mental-tool-and-for-some-it-goes-terribly-wrong
https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_meditation_cause_you_harm
Marianne Spoon wrote the original article which appeared in Center for Healthy Minds. This is her bio.
Marianne leads communications and marketing for the Center for Healthy Minds at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, where she produces written and multimedia stories, coordinates with media interested in the Center’s work and manages its brand and external-facing publications.
Before joining the University of Wisconsin–Madison, she conducted behavioral research with monkeys and worked as a freelance journalist for media outlets including the Discovery Channel, HowStuffWorks.com and Atlanta’s NPR affiliate.
Numbness, agitation, Doubt of your practice, teacher or life itself. leg pain, back pain, Sleepiness, Insomnia, Panic, Chest tension, Nausea, Feelings of withdrawal, disgust in the mundane, impostor syndrome, Loss of interest, Loss of joy, Stress, Addiction (relapse), Chronic pain, Mood disorders, Psychiatric disorders, Hyper-arousal, trauma flashback, emotional instability, Hypersensitivity, disembodiment, dissociation, sadness, paranoia, 'Zen sickness' (ear ringing, heat or cold feeling, sweats, fatigue, , Emptiness, Emotional, Return of repressed memory, Guilt, Negativity, dizziness, loss of hope, suicidal ideations, fear,
In this, the old adage; 'The obstacle becomes the path'. It is these that become our most devoted teachers and lessons.
Joseph Campbell said. 'Follow your bliss' so as a remedy, stop and do something relaxing and nice, make a meal, feed the birds, have a glass of iced tea. Listen to music.
Thursday, July 1, 2021
The weapons of the Dharma protectors. The weapon I have.
I grew up around guns. I lived in the Sierras of Northern California. We had many hunters and it was not uncommon to see rifles on racks in pickup trucks. Before becoming a Buddhist and a minister I entertained the idea of law enforcement as well as military service, but not as a Chaplain. I had friends with rifles and handguns and own some myself. I have taken lots of training for a civilian and use the art of firearms as a meditation and see it similar to the Zen practice of archery (Kyudo).
I became interested in Buddhism from my training in martial arts. I had been injured in a traditional Ju Jitsu class and had to 'retire' from that part of the practice but was interested in the philosophy of the marital arts and the links we had in the West to Buddhism like the television series Kung Fu and the fascination of the Shao Lin monks and even in Bruce Lee.
In college I began to explore meditation. The demographics of the university was not at all Buddhist and it was difficult to find anything helpful in the way of meditation practice. This was the early 1980s and there was not much yet. Later, after graduating I went to a retreat at a local monastery and was hooked. I studied with the monks and nuns and not only travelled with them throughout much of the Buddhist world but also eventually became an ordained Buddhist Minister. I took 10 precepts, none of them said anything about weapons at all. Not that I really cared anyway. Some argue that it breaks the first precept of not taking a life, but having a gun does not mean you have or will take a life. It is no different than owning a knife. It can be used for skillful things or unskillful, it can be use to help and to harm. Even if you look into 'engaged Buddhism' of Plum Village and their 14 precepts there is no mention of weapons or guns. I took and maintain the precepts and when and if I fail at them I work to become better. I practice to help myself and others where I can. Taking the precepts and following the Eight Fold Path did change me to be more compassionate and understanding as well as to have greater knowledge of how we work as people and how we can learn to better react to them. Now one can argue that there are things that we should not do in the view of the Eight Fold Path such as 'right action', thinking or livelihood. As in the teachings it does say to not do what the 'wise' would censure one for. But there is still no mention of weapons or guns.
When working with people that are learning meditation and looking to put Buddhist practice into their daily lives I get to know them and they get to know me. Sometimes the fact that I am a gun owner and a CCW Permit (Concealed Carry Weapon Permit) holder comes up. Some people are confused and some are down right offended that I would even think of owning a gun. I have taught and counseled many people that are and were military, police and security. They have to have these weapons around them and can also benefit from the teachings and practice of Buddhism and the meditations it offers.
For the permit I had to take training and a class as well as pass a background and security check to get the license. I do not consider myself political really and carry and had training for safety and confidence in my abilities at a shooting range. I generally do not get into discussions about the Second Amendment as I am not a lawyer or politician and believe that is for them to figure out.
Shooting ranges, in my experience are very controlled environments with definite feel of a place of mindfulness and attention, like some zendos or temples I have visited. Everything is coordinated and done in the same manner like many Buddhist meditation centers and temples. Now I know that most people that have attended a workshop or spent time at a temple or zendo would find it hard to find any similarities.
I was recently speaking to a patient of mine who is also a Concealed Carry License holder and carries a handgun routinely. He had taken training just as I had done and was also a member of a local Christian church. I happened to see an advertisement for churches' security called Faith Based Security Advisory Council which is an organization overseen by the Department of Homeland Security. He was a security team member at his church. I had seen armed security at Synagogues I had visited and at other Christian churches, and at every UNDV event I attended, but those were military and police security teams from the hosting country. So many guns and other anti violence measures which were obviously violent.
So why do Buddhists seem to have such an aversion of guns? There are many many weapons of the Dharmapalas; Swords, Ropes, Spears, Axes, Knives, Thunderbolts, Arrows with bows, and clubs. They are not only weapons of war or protection but of Devine realization. So how come guns are seen as so very evil.
Some say that a gun is designed to kill a person, what about a sword? No one uses one to eat with, to cut bread, they use a bread knife, Can a machete which is designed to be used on plants be used on people and animals for violence? Sure.
A gun, like any weapon, can hold a lot of emotion for people. When people think that Buddhism is totally pacifist they are wrong. Many times Buddhists have had to defend themselves from outside (and inside) threats. They had to use violence and weapons. They also had to accept that karmic debt in that practice. There are of course stories of the saints and highly attained masters that overcame violence with wisdom, non attachment and loving kindness. I do believe in that, but there are times to act accordingly. For example, even in today's world we have mass shootings and 'active shooter drills' at schools. The training advice that they have can also follow the Buddhist principles of non-violence at first in the advice to flee, then hide... finally if cornered and only then to fight back. This is a common advice to schools, places of worship and shopping centers. It is a modern fact of life, like it or not. Buddhist temples of the past also had to deal with bandits, gangs, and ruffians that would do them harm, steal their supplies, food and 'treasures' and harm those living on the grounds. There are also stories of warrior monks and people that stepped forward, including monks that had to defend their lives and temples from such threats. The ones that were totally pacifist all the time did not last long.
There are many dharma protectors (Dharmapalas) in all forms of Buddhist practice. There are some in Theravada, Mahayana and many in Vajrayana. These generally are mythical figures but some are actually based on real life people.
In Theravada not only kings of the real regions are protectors of the Dhamma but also are some of the deities that are left over from Hindu/Vedic lines like Vishnu, Shiva, Ganesh as wells as the Four Protectors of Mount Meru.
In Vajrayana there are eight main protectors; The Tibetan (Vajrayana) Dharmapalas are; Beg-tse, Tsangs-Pa, Kuvera, Lhamo, Yama, Yamantaka, Hayagriva, and Mahakala.
In Chinese temples and some Japanese temples you can see the Wisdom Kings. There are five in esoteric Buddhism, they are;
Gundari Myoo, Ratnasambhava representation 'The dispenser of Heavenly Nectar' He holds a spear and a sword.
Fudo Myoo (Acala) ' The immovable one' represents Mahavairocana, He holds a sword and a noose in the left hand. He uses this to catch straying souls and keep them from going astray.
Daiitoku Myo-o: (Yamantaka), 'One who stops the power of hell'. Holds a trident, a wheel, a sword, and a jeweled club. Helps to purge the practitioner of weakness and evil.
Kongoyashi Myo-o; Conqueror of the three planes. He carries on the right a bell, thunderbolt, an arrow and a sword and on the left is a trident, a bow and a lasso.
Gozanze Myo-o; The vanquisher of the three realms.
In Chinese Buddhism there are 24 protective deities. This includes all the above in one form or another and some Hindu variations as well as some manifestations of actual generals in Chinese history.
So each it seems have some weapons. Why not guns? Well when these were first mentioned there were none. Simple as that. Perhaps today if there were Dharmapalas they would have lightsabers and missile launchers, who knows.
I have a gun, it is a weapon, a tool nut not a toy. I handle it very carefully, mindfully and practice with it in a manner that is non harmful to myself or others. I have no intention of harming someone with it but also understand the responsibility I take for my own karma of having, handling and training with a firearm. It does not make me any less Buddhist than anyone else. It does not break any of the precepts nor the any of the parts of the Noble Eight Fold Path. It may cause some disdain, stress, and mental harm, but that comes from them, not me. It is no different than carrying any other tool.
Am I a Dharmapala? Maybe I will be. I protect the interpretation of the Dharma and help people see their attachments, ignorances and angers and deal with them with wisdom, release and kindness.
References:
https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/vajrayana/tantra-advanced/what-are-dharma-protectors
https://www.kcpinternational.com/2019/11/five-wisdom-kings-five-wisdom-buddhas-japanese-buddhism/
https://www.buddhistdoor.net/features/with-the-wrath-of-a-serpent-the-propagation-of-gudari-myoo-iconography
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/45621
https://www.buddhistinquiry.org/article/the-buddha-taught-nonviolence-not-pacifism/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43300221
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an05/an05.075.than.html
https://www.thoughtco.com/war-and-buddhism-449732
https://alanpeto.com/buddhism/buddhist-soldier-military/
Saturday, June 5, 2021
Disturbing thoughts - RAIN meditation process.
In my classes I tell people to first sit to become still, be still to see, we then see ... ( dang I forget)
It is basically the same process that I was taught by Buddhist Monks and Nuns over the past 15 years.
Often when we begin the process of meditation we have a hard time because so many thoughts are there, we see them all arising at once and it seems there is no way to stop them.
Watching the brain train. (Would be good to get a few pictures of a train from up close and from far away, actions would be best for this example)
We spend time in meditation just watching the thoughts come and go like a fast train going by, car by car by car. You cannot even read the logos or words on the side of the train car as it goes. This is frustrating and one of the things that people do is try to stop the mind or stop the thoughts. That is impossible. The train goes, you can pick one car to focus on and that is about it. One thought you may notice, and it either excites you or disturbs you. Now if we step back from the train, we can see all the cars, they seem to go slowly and we can see each as it is, not in a blur. That is the importance of sitting to become still, we slowly distance ourselves from the thought train and begin to see the whole train, or in our case the whole mind.
CULTIVATION
In my discussions on cultivating the mind like I did the little grass patch in my backyard I mentioned that we need to see it pretty closely to see the weeds verses the actual blades of grass. This is about the same idea. We need to find a comfortable distance from the mind (or grass or train) in order to see it more clearly. That is a skill that comes with practice over time. It does not occur all by itself or as a flash like 'Satori' or and enlightenment does. It is a process that develops over hours, days weeks or years depending on the effort we put into it. We have to know a lot about the mind and how OUR mind works in order to do and understand this.
Once we understand the speed of the mind, we can learn to step back and see it from a different, non engaged place. We can
RAIN
Let it rain. A meditation on pain. (all sorts of mental and physical dilemas.)
The RAIN 'formula' acronym for a meditative process that has been used for over 2,000 years. The basis of meditation is attention, contemplatio and realization.
So in this RAIN acronym, I will place out, step by step the way to deal with disturbing thoughts.
The "R" in rain stands for 'recognize'.
Recognize first that you are sitting and thinking, meditation is an active process. Recognize as a feeling arises, what emotion is it? Although it may just BE there, it may also change. Notice what it does now that you acknowledge its existence and have a 'name' for it.
This is not the time to do any judgement of the feeling or emotion or to give it any power at all, just observe it. Noticing it from the background of your regular beingness is important for this step.
The "A" in rain stands for 'Accept'.
This is where we start to sense some emotion or charge to what we are feeling, what we have recognized and we accept it AS it is. That is all, just let it be in your conscious field. Still in the sense of observance, we accept it as A feeling or emotion, there is nothing else to do with it for right now.
The "I" in rain stands for 'Investigate'.
We investigate deeper, where is it at in our body? Where did it come from, where is it going? Does it change?
The "N" in rain stands for 'Non-identification'
Now take that emotion, feeling and sense and, in your mind, watch it from afar, it is not you, it is not who you are, there is no permanence in it. Like you, it changes constantly and only become more close and vivid if you give it that focus. Let the idea, emotion, feeling and thought dissolve like a cloud on a sunny day.
Now using the RAIN acronym may not be a full recognize, accept, investigate, and non-identify order or process. You may just choose to stay in acceptance or whatever for a while. There is time. Remember, meditation is not an end all, nor is it a fix, it is a process of learning and understanding of your own mind with the goal of becoming the controller and not the controlled. This is the development of wisdom, generosity and compassion for the self.
What are disturbing thoughts? Ones you dislike or really like fall into this category.
What is the reason we start a garden? It is the why... We do it for many reasons; some for food, some for relaxation, some to help the environment and some just as a hobby to pass time or just for something to do. It is the same really for meditation. Some practice meditation to nourish themselves, some for relaxation, some to be part of a community, some just to pass time and some just to have something to do. That is not to say that people don't have as many reasons as there are personalities. This is fir simplicity sake, so that we can see the similarities between meditation and gardening.
The why can be important. Just like in gardening, it may change the size of the garden, the types of plants, the amount we are willing to do to change the soil etc...
When we start the process of meditation we need to first evaluate what we already have and where we would like to go with it. It is the same in gardening, we have to look at the ground, how many rocks, where the sun shines, the types of soi
Wednesday, May 26, 2021
How many Buddhism's?
So I started to expand on the main types of Buddhism as I knew them; Mahayana, Theravada, Vajrayana and Zen (even though the last two are often considered Mahayana). In doing my research there were at least a few more if you start to include esoteric and Hinayana schools. In looking deeper I found over 206 schools of thought. Of course, many were subtle offshoots of other older schools and some were considered 'new movement' schools like Navayana of the South West of India, made famous by Dalits (the lowest class of person in the Vedic teachings or Hindu culture) and B.R. Ambedkar who was, himself a Dalit who became educated and basically is the founder of this ideal. Other groups we are also seeing are; Ecumenical, nonsectarian, (Ri-me in Tibetan) , secular, Fundamental, Traditional..
More subtle versions of Buddhism that are developing in the West.
What is the difference?
There are three main branches of Buddhist thought and teaching in the world today.
Mahayana or as translated as 'the Great Vehicle' is prevalent in China, Taiwan, Japan and Korea.
Theravada as translated 'The Elder's Vehicle' is more common in South East Asia such as Sri Lanka, Thailand, Burma and Cambodia.
Hinayana, or 'Lesser Vehicle' was a term used to describe Theravada but was considered derogatory. It is a term that the World Federation of Buddhists basically 'retired' in 1950 and is not used today.
Vajrayana or 'Diamond Vehicle' is that of the Tibetan plateau, Nepal and some parts of Mongolia.
Navayana 'New Vehicle' is a newer version in the South West of India and is a popular way for the lowest caste of India the Dalits to break away from the caste system.
There are two others that are rarely mentioned the Azhali and Newari Buddhist groups. Azhali is an off shoot of Vajrayana that settled in China in the Yunan Province of South Eastern China. Just North of Burma, Laos and Vietnam.
The Newari Buddhist tradition is located in the areas of Nepal and is another offshoot of Vajrayana Buddhism located in a cultural area of Newar.
Esoteric Buddhism,
Ecumenical Buddhism,
Secular Buddhism
No, it is not new, any of them. But here is what happened over time.
The Ri-me version is Tibetan and is rather new, apparently founded by
https://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Jamg%C3%B6n_Kongtrul_Lodr%C3%B6_Tay%C3%A9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schools_of_Buddhism#Mah%C4%81y%C4%81na_schools
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_Buddhism
Tuesday, April 27, 2021
Meditation reboot
Building a community.
In order to have a community we need a couple things, this is how I think of it.
1. A unifying concept: people that care deeply about...BELONGING, Clearly defined WHY. Goal or interest. 'Buddhist X' (Generation X).
Looking to the lessons and not the transcript of Buddhist teaching and thought. How to apply this to everyday life and
2. A common enemy (either a concept, idea, statement, group or individual.) Real or imagined.
Against 'woke', 'hip', 'trite' Buddhists...??? The belief that this intrusion of thought from other concepts should be boiled down to 'there is suffering' and leave it at that, all the rest of the details are just fluff and not important to the idea of (the Four Noble Truths).
Another 'enemy' is fakers, predators and charlatans.
3. A set of beliefs 'We think this because...' People like 'us' do things like 'this'...
Who is 'us'??
What are 'things'
4. Offer something of value.
Message to start up meditation classes again.
It has been a long time, I have missed our sessions.
In light of the obvious reasons we could not have class, I am starting to gear up for a new schedule. Minor changes I am looking to implement are either subject based meditations, Dharma teachings (actual teachings of Buddhism from the Sutras), or simple topical discussions including Buddhism in the news.
I am leaning still towards a more secular time, with any chanting, prostrations and traditional offerings done before the class begins. You would all be of course welcome to attend that part as well.
The next topic is the schedule itself and which days people feel would be most beneficial. Of course, I may just intend a 'build it and they will come' schedule.
I am toying with the suggestion of 'semi private' classes where we do not wear masks nor
Burnout, stressors, languishing, grief, confusion, frustration, fatigue, malaise, depression, anger, fear and more.
Tuesday, March 23, 2021
I might be a secular Buddhist.
Oh my goodness, I think I am a Secular Buddhist (Am I?).
Secular: The dictionary defines it as; denoting attitudes, activities, or other things that have no religious or spiritual basis. And (of clergy) not subject to or bound by religious rule; not belonging to or living in a monastic or other order. (This is when I looked up the word on Secular).
I have a long history of study in Buddhism. I started studying in the 1970s when I had seen Kung Fu movies and the television series starring David Caradine. I was enamored with the Shaolin monks and what the wisdom was and how they approached problems. I continued in college reading and absorbing anything I could related to Buddhism, music, art, writings, books and the like. I was deep into it. I had no access at the time to anyone who actually WAS a Buddhist. I had taken many martial arts classes, workshops and spent a long time learning different techniques; throws, arm bars, takedowns, kicks and falls… I still never met any of my teachers that were actually Buddhists. They studied it, but they were largely Westerners knowledgeable about some Buddhist concepts, some Taoist concepts and many cultural concepts that related to the techniques I was studying.
Later I happened to find a meditation retreat hosted by a not so local temple a little ways from my home. I went and immediately became immersersed and enamored by it. I hung around the temple, talked often to the abbot, learned from him and eventually became close friends. I then became
The simili of the empty cup. >>> A good start to approach but not to stay that way. Once you know you know and you should discuss and debate each subject with yourself and with others to see through it and go from there.
Doug’s Secular Dharma explains it as; “it is not a fixed thing, there is no definition, it is something made up as we go along.” It is a practice that we follow.
There are some fundamental differences between traditional Buddhism and Secular Buddhism. Namely rituals and images. It really seems as if it is a more educational study of the practice and attempts to define each of the concepts of Buddhism in more modern non cultural ways. “Devotional practices require you to (sort of ) have a belief in something like a god, because you are debasing yourself in front of something, it has to be something that’s extremely powerful presumably, something that is wise and good.” So
I think this is a pretty good definition in that it is a fluid and changing definition and one that as you start to practice will help you without dogma. Later as you get deeper without drowning, you can begin to see the historical, cultural and psychological benefit of all of those things that you once denied.
(Story of the monks and priests joking around, and then when I asked them why they were not that way in public… basically they said that if they acted as they did when they met in private, they would be ridiculed by their parishioners and they would complain and that would cause more trouble than it was worth. It is better to show solidarity in individuality to gain the slow and gentle acceptance from your own parishioners than to try and force it and shock them. They may leave or abandon or even attack you...
Secular does not mean cherry picking…
Secular does not deny practices, but hopes to reframe them into more palatable forms for the Westerner to practice.
The problem with traditionalists: FIxated in culture and lineage, staunch in their belief in what is right or wrong.
Supernatural attachments.
Reliance on cultural and traditional aspects that …
The problem with secularists:
More often than not, they are reformed from another religion and had a poor experience and did not get deep enough into that practice to lose the self in it.
They drop essential practices as either archaic or
How the Buddha practiced was preserved in a monks aspect. It is a way for us to apply this to our own lives as they are for a lay person. Not as a struct
The middle path…Somewhere between secular and
Practical application of the dharma without traditional supernatural concerns
Doug's Dharma on Secular Buddhism. https://youtu.be/UtRk4qD8a-0